ISSN 1524-0215
Vol. 20, Issue 3, 2009July 01, 2009 EDT
Two-Step Versus One-Step RNA-to-CT™ 2-Step and One-Step RNA-to-CT™ 1-Step: Validity, Sensitivity, and Efficiency
Two-Step Versus One-Step RNA-to-CT™ 2-Step and One-Step RNA-to-CT™ 1-Step: Validity, Sensitivity, and Efficiency
Al-Shanti Nasser, Saini Amarjit, Stewart Claire E.,
Articles in Vol. 20, Issue 3, 2009
Vol. 20, Issue 3, 2009
- Multiplex Amplicon Genotyping by High-Resolution MeltingSeipp Michael T.Durtschi Jacob D.Voelkerding Karl V.Wittwer Carl T.
- A Method for Preparing DNA Sequencing Templates Using a DNA-Binding MicroplateYang YuHebron Haroun R.Hang Jun
- Two-Step Versus One-Step RNA-to-CT™ 2-Step and One-Step RNA-to-CT™ 1-Step: Validity, Sensitivity, and EfficiencyAl-Shanti NasserSaini AmarjitStewart Claire E.
- Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Survey: Service Laboratory FundingOgorzalek Loo RachelNicolet Charles M.Niece Ronald L.Young MarySimpson John T.
- Article Watch, July 2009Slaughter Clive
1.
Nasser AS, Amarjit S, Claire E. S. Two-Step Versus One-Step RNA-to-CTTM 2-Step and One-Step RNA-to-CTTM 1-Step: Validity, Sensitivity, and Efficiency. JBT. 2009;20(3):172-179.